Rollup of 2 pull requests #124377
Rollup of 2 pull requests #124377
Conversation
beta was branched long ago, so can be removed
Improved code with clippy
I haven't used the bootstrapped compiler, but I think I have made some improvements using clippy. I have already made the following changes to the compiler:
Replaced `self.first().is_digit(10)` with `self.first().is_ascii_digit()` on lines 633, 664, and 680 of compiler/rust_lexer/src/lib.rs.
Removed unnecessary cast on line 262 of compiler/rustc_lexer/src/unescape.rs
Replaced ok_or_else with ok_or on line 303 of compiler/rustc_lexer/src/unescape.rs
Replaced `!std::env::var("RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP").is_ok()` with `std::env::var("RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP").is_err()` on line 4 of compiler/rustc_macros/build.rs
Removed needless borrow for generic argument `env`on line 53 of compiler/rust_llvm/build.rs
…rrors tests: remove few ignore-stage2 beta was branched long ago, so can be removed
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=2 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: 9e6c4fddda In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (38dd569): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 670.761s -> 671.322s (0.08%) |
Successful merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup